|
AUTHORS
Dr B B Mahajan
Associate
Professor & Head Dermatology
Dr Neerja Puri
Registrar Dermatology
DEPARTMENT OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, G.G.S. MEDICAL COLLEGE
& HOSPITAL, FARIDKOT. 151203. PUNJAB.
ADDRESS
FOR CORRESPONDENCE
Dr Neerja Puri
# 626, Phase II,
Urban Estate,
Dugri Road,
Ludhiana.
Punjab. India.
Cell :09814616427
ABSTRACT
A two
day old male infant presented with giant melanocytic naevi over the back, neck,
right axilla and both shoulders with multiple congenital melanocytic naevi over
the buttocks,arms chest, abdomen and left little toe nail. Giant melanocytic
naevi are very distressing to the patients. Also the significant risk of
malignant change warrants prophylactic removal. However, their large size poses
a great surgical challenge.
KEY WORDS: Congenital melanocytic
naevi; giant: hairy naevus : malignancy.
INTRODUCTION
Congenital melanocytic naevi are
brown or black moles which are present at birth or which develop in the first
year or so of life (brown birth marks).1 Giant congenital naevi are
greater than 20 cm in diameter. They are often found on the trunk when they are
known as ‘bathing trunk' naevi. Very large, giant or bathing trunk naevi are
very rare.
Congenital
melanocytic naevi present as multishaded pigmented patches, oval shaped and
fairly uniform in appearance.2 Those with large naevi have numerous
smaller satellite lesions. Most congenital naevi grow with the child and
generally they become proportionally smaller and less obvious with time.
However, sometimes the lesion becomes darker especially at puberty. They may
develop a bumpy surface or become more hairy. The cause of congenital
melanocytic naevi is unknown but they are probably caused by localized genetic
abnormalities. They are formed by overgrowths of the melanocytes. Malignant
melanoma, sometimes develops within congenital melanocytic naevi.3
The risk of this happening in a small or medium sized mole is very small(under
1%). Melanoma is more likely in the giant naevi (perhaps about 5% over a
lifetime) especially in those that lie across the spine.4
We hereby report a case of a giant
hairy bathing trunk naevus covering the back, neck and shoulders, along with
small congenital melanocytic naevi scattered all over the body.
CASE REPORT
A 2 days old male infant presented
with a congenital large pigmented patch covering the back, neck, buttocks and
axilla (Fig 1). The lesion was black in
colour with convolutions on the back. The pigmented patch over the axilla had
1-3 cm sized hair over the patch (Fig 2). There were also present small
multiple pigmented satellite lesions of varying diameters (1cm to 3 cm),
scattered all over the body (Fig 3). A nail bed naevus was present in the left
little toe nail (Fig 4). There were no other associated congenital anomalies.
Fundus examination, X ray spine, CT head and spine and ultrasound abdomen were
all normal. The biopsy of the patient was taken and the histopathological
findings were consistent with congenital melanocytic naevus. There were nest
& cords of naevus cells filling the dermis and extending into the
subcutaneous (Fig 5). The dermis consisted entirely of heavily pigmented naevus
cells containing melanin. No junctional activity or evidence of malignant
transformation was seen.
DISCUSSION
Congenital melanocytic naevi present
as multishaded pigmented patches, oval shaped and fairly uniform in appearance.
Those with large naevi have numerous smaller satellite lesions.5
Most congenital naevi grow with the child and generally they are proportionally
smaller and less obvious with time. However, sometimes the lesion becomes
darker especially at puberty. They may develop a bumpy surface or become more
hairy. Rarely they fade away and may even disappear altogether.
Most small congenital naevi (less
than 1.5 cm in diameter) need no specific treatment. However, it can be useful
for follow up to have taken a close-up photograph of a mole with a ruler beside
it. Giant hairy naevus may undergo malignant transformation in 3.7% of cases.6
Large congenital melanocytic naevi can be removed surgically, but surgical
removal can be difficult (or impossible) and always results in scarring.7
Laser treatment is sometimes helpful. In selected lesions, pigmented lasers can
be used to fade flat naevi, but this is not always successful.
Giant congenital melanocytic naevi
may lead to severe cosmetic deformities and subsequent psychosocial problems
for the child. Another important problem is the relatively high potential of
giant congenital melanocytic naevi to undergo malignant transformation.8Management
of such lesions presents an enormous difficulty.
The choice of
surgical procedures depends on the consideration of the importance of the
patients cosmetic appearance, the reduction of risk of malignancy and the
maintaining of normal function. Excision is the surest method of removing all
potentially malignant cells. However, great strides have been made in
excisional surgery, but inspite of it the cosmetic results are sometimes less
than satisfactory. Dermabrasion has also been successfully employed with
gratifying cosmetic results, but leaving behind naevus cells in the deep dermis
has been a serious objection in the procedure.9
Most congenital naevi do not need
specific treatment. However, it can be useful for follow up to have taken a
close up photograph of the mole with a ruler beside it. This makes it easier to
see if there has been any growth or change in it sometime later.
Congenital naevi
are sometimes surgically removed. Reasons include :
- Unsightly appearance
- Worry about risk of melanoma
- Difficulty in keeping an eye on
the mole (e.g scalp, back or sole).
- Change (darkening,lumpiness etc)
within the lesion or unexpected growth.
- Melanoma like appearance (i.e
irregular shape, variegated colour).
Congenital naevi, depending on size and location, may have a
significant impact on cosmesis. Giant congenital naevi place individuals at an
increased risk for the development of melanoma at the site of the naevus.10
For giant congenital melanocytic naevi, the risk of developing melanoma has
been reported to be as high as 5-7% by the age of 60 years.11 A few
studies suggest that the risk of melanoma may be greater in those with giant
congenital melanocytic naevi with more satellite lesions or a larger diameter.
The malignant potential of small or midsized congenital melanocytic naevi is
controversial. However, many experts believe that a small naevus does not
significantly increase the lifetime risk of developing melanoma.
The case report of giant bathing trunk naevus is being presented
because of its rarity.
REFERENCES
- Walton RG, Jacobs AH, Cox AJ.
Pigmented lesions in new born infants. Br J Dermatol 1996; 95 : 289- 290.
- Castilla EE, Da Grace Dutra M,
Oriolio-Parreiras JM. Epidemiology
of congenital pigmented nevi : incidence rates and relative frequencies.
Br J Dermatol 1991;104 : 307-315.
- Kopf AW, bart RS, Hennessay P. Congenital
nevocytic nevi and malignant melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999 ; 1 :
123-130.
- Mackie RM. Melanocytic nevi and
malignant melanoma. In : Rooks textbook of dermatology, 5th
edition. Eds Champion RH, burton JL, Ebling FJG, Oxford ; Blackwell
scientific publications 1993 ; pp 1525-1560.
- Rinz- Maldonado R, tamaya L, lateza Am,
Duran c. Giant pigmented nevi ‘Clinical, histo[athological, and
therapeutic considerationions. J.
Paediatrics 1992;120: 906-911.
- Kaplan EN. The risk of malignancy
in large congenital nevi. Plast reconstr Surg 1994 ; 53: 421.
- Moss ALH. Congenital giant
nevus : A preliminary report of a
new surgical approach. Br J Plast Surgery 1987; 40 : 410-419.
- Lorentzen M, Pers M, Bretteville
Jensen G. The incidence of malignant transformation in giant pigmented
naevi. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1997 ; 11 : 163-167.
- Miller CJ, Becker DW. Removing
pigmentation by dermabrading naevi in infancy. Br J Plast surg
1999;124-126.
- Swerdlon AJ, English JSC, Qia OZ.
The risk of melanoma in patients with congenital naevi. J Am Acad dermatol
1995; 32 : 595-599.
- Quaba AA, Wallace AE. The
incidence of malignant melanoma arising in a congenital melanocytic naevi.
Plast Reconstr Surgery 1996 ; 78 :174-179.
|